Module
Objectives
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
- Describe indications for cesarean section
- Explain preoperative planning for cesarean section including options for anesthesia and patient preparation
- Demonstrate the steps of a cesarean section
- Describe possible perioperative complications
United States Cesarean Rate, 1970-2011

- Current: CDC, National Centers for Health Statistics
- Historical: CDC. Rates of cesarean delivery, 1993. MMWR 1995;44:303-307.; Am J Public Health. 1987 August; 77(8): 955-959.
United States Cesarean Rate, 2016-2018

- NCHS, National Vital Statistics System, Natality.
Indications for Cesarean Section
These first three indications represent 80% of primary C sections in the U.S.:
- Non-reassuring fetal status
- Cephalopelvic disproportion or failed labor
- Fetal malpresentation
Other indications include:
- Previous cesarean section
- classical section - absolute indication
- Abnormal placentation (previa or accrete)
- Cord prolapse
- Macrosomia
- > 4500 g in diabetic patient
- > 5000 g in non-diabetic patient
- Infections
- Active herpes simplex virus (HSV) genital lesion
- 38-week scheduled C-section for HIV viral load > 1000
- History of significant shoulder dystocia
- Prior vaginal surgery or repair
- Prior myomectomy entering uterine cavity
- Abdominal cerclage
- Certain fetal anomalies
- Severe hydrocephalus
- Fetal bleeding disorders
- Worsening preeclampsia remote from delivery
- Perimortem
- Maternal request
- Other
Cesarean Delivery Upon Maternal Request
- Informed consent, including discussion
- Early in prenatal care
- Frequently throughout the pregnancy
- Not before 39 weeks of gestation
- Should not be performed due to lack of adequate pain control options in labor
- Not recommended for women desiring several children because of increased risk of:
- Placenta previa
- Placenta accreta
- Gravid hysterectomy
- Abnormal placentation and accompanying complication (hemorrhage, scar tissue formation, cesarean hysterectomy)
Indications for Cesarean Section
- Labor arrest 34%
- Nonreassuring fetal tracing 23%
- Malpresentation 17%
- Multiple gestation 7%
- Maternal-fetal 5%
- Other obstetric indications 4%
- Macrosomia 4%
- Maternal request 3%
- Preeclampsia 3%
Preparation for Cesarean Section
- Preoperative informed consent
- Review risks, benefits and alternatives
- Anesthesia
- Spinal
- Epidural
- Combined spinal-epidural
- General
- Prophylactic measures:
- Perioperative antibiotics
- Antacid (ie, Bicitra)
- Teds/SCDs
- Sequential compression device (SCDs)
- Preoperative labs
- Complete blood count (CBC), type and screen
- Type and cross for those at risk for postpartum or intrapartum hemorrhage


- Pre-op fetal monitoring
- Determine fetal/placental position
- Patient positioning
- Dorsal supine, left tilt
- Grounding pad
- Hair clipping at surgical site
- Foley catheter placement
- Abdominal prep/vaginal prep/sterile draping
- NICU/Peds aware
- Perform time-out
Steps of the Procedure Entry
-
- Skin incision
- Scalpel or electrocautery
- Transverse versus vertical incision
- Size of incision
- Subcutaneous layer
- Divided with scalpel, electrocautery or bluntly to permit visualization of fascia
- Fascial layer
- Central incision made sharply and two layers of fascia divided laterally in a sharp or blunt fashion
Images courtesy of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. - Rectus muscle layer
- Pfannenstiel: Vertical separation
- Modified Maylard: Sharply divide rectus muscles in transverse fashion if additional exposure is needed
- Peritoneal layer
- Open bluntly or sharply
- Open high to avoid bladder
- Be aware of possible intraperitoneal adhesions
- Be aware of underlying bowel
- Ensure adequate exposure
- Skin incision
-
- Bladder flap
- No conclusive evidence that creation of a bladder flap decreases risk of intraoperative or postoperative complications
- To form bladder flap:
- Vesicouterine serosa opened superior to the bladder and incision extended laterally
- Bladder separated bluntly or sharply from the underlying lower uterine segment
- Bladder blade retractor placed to protect bladder
The loose serosa above the upper margin of the bladder is elevated and incised laterally. Reprinted with permission from McGraw-Hill Education: Williams Obstetrics, 24th edition. - Bladder flap
-
Uterine Incision
- Low transverse (most common)
- Low vertical
- Mid transverse
- Classical
- Consider:
- Fetal size and position
- Development of the lower uterine segment
- Position of placenta
- Obstructing adhesions or fibroids
Image used by permission from Hacker and Moore’s Essentials of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5th edition. - Low transverse uterine incision
- Most common, preferred to decrease risk of lateral extensions
- To form uterine incision:
- Use scalpel to begin hysterotomy
- Can complete uterine entry bluntly with index finger to decrease risk of fetal injury
- Incision extended bluntly or with bandage scissors: Blunt extension associated with less blood loss1
- Can bluntly open/extend incision in a transverse manner (as seen on right) or in a cephalocaudal manner
- Extension in a cephalocaudal manner associated with reduced blood loss and unintended extension 2
- Stay clear of the uterine vessels found laterally
Image used by permission from McGraw-Hill Education: Williams Obstetrics, 24th edition. - Classical incision:
- Vertical incision through the active segment/fundus
- Increased blood loss
- Closed in multiple layers
- Higher rate of uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies (4-9%)1
- Not a candidate for TOLAC after classical cesarean section
- Common indications for classical incision:
- Preterm breech with undeveloped lower uterine segment
- Transverse back-down fetal position
- Adhesions/fibroids obstructing the lower uterine segment
- Scheduled cesarean hysterectomy
- Perimortem
Reprinted by permission from McGraw-Hill Education: Williams Obstetrics 24th edition. -
Delivery of Fetus
- Amniotomy
- May opt to deliver “en-caul” in cases of extreme prematurity or maternal infection (i.e., HIV)
- Maneuvers depend on position of fetus or fetuses
Images courtesy of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
- Amniotomy
-
Delivery of Vertex Fetus
- Fetal head is manually elevated through the hysterotomy
- Fundal pressure can aid the delivery
- Avoid placing pressure on lower uterine segment to decrease risk of extensions
- Delivery of the shoulders with gentle traction
- Delivery of the body follows
Reprinted by permission from McGraw-Hill Education: Williams Obstetrics, 24th edition
-
Difficult Delivery of Fetal Head
- Is the fetal head floating?
- Operative delivery of fetal head: forceps or vacuum
- Internal podalic version
- Is the fetal head impacted in pelvis?
- Use of a vaginal hand to de-station fetal head out of the pelvis and elevate toward the hysterotomy
Reprinted with permission from McGraw-Hill Education: Williams Obstetrics, 24th edition. - Is the fetal head floating?
-
- Fetal breech presenting part is grasped and brought to the hysterotomy
- Fetus delivered to level of the sacrum
- Rotate to sacrum anterior
- Wrap fetal body in moist blue towel and deliver to level of scapulae
- Rotate fetus side to side sweeping fetal arms over chest
- Mauriceau-Smellie-Veit maneuver: Operator index and middle fingers used to place gentle downward traction on fetal maxilla to flex fetal head; assistant may apply fundal pressure to assist
Courtesy of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. -
Delivery of Fetus
- Umbilical cord doubly clamped and cut: Delayed cord clamping should be considered
- Infant handed off the field to appropriate team (NICU/Peds/RN/OB) for assessment and resuscitation if needed
- Obtain cord blood and gas (if indicated): Can also be drawn from clamped segment of cord following delivery of placenta
Courtesy of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. -
Delivery of Placenta
- Spontaneous (gentle traction) or manual extraction of placenta
- Spontaneous preferred as it decreases risk of blood loss and endomyometritis
- Uterine cavity explored with a hand covered in a sponge gauze to remove any remaining placental tissue or membranes
- Intraveneous oxytocin administered to reduce uterine bleeding
- Additional uterotonics as needed
- Uterine massage to facilitate uterine contraction/involution
Reprinted by permission from McGraw-Hill Education: Williams Obstetrics, 24th edition. -
- Extra-abdominal (exteriorized) versus
intra-abdominal uterine incision closure
- Intra-abdominal closure associated with less nausea1
- No difference in surgical time or infection risk2,3
- No overall clinically significant difference although may be faster return of bowel function with in situ repair
- Evaluate for possible hysterotomy extensions – repair as necessary
- Single versus double layer closure
- Many suggest double layer closure for women who desire future pregnancies
- No randomized controlled trial to support1
- Either is acceptable
- Locked versus running suture closure -0- delayed absorbable suture
- Ensure hemostasis
- Abdominal irrigation versus no irrigation
- Routinely performed in many centers, no proven benefit; may increase intraoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperative nausea1
Reprinted by permission from McGraw-Hill Education. Williams Obstetrics 24th edition. 1American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Fetal macrosomia. ACOG Practice Bulletin 22. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2000.
2Anorlu RI, Maholwana B, Hofmeyr GJ. Methods of delivering the placenta at caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD004737. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004737.pub2.
3Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:29-38. - Extra-abdominal (exteriorized) versus
intra-abdominal uterine incision closure
-
- Peritoneal layer closure versus no closure
- No significant benefit from closure noted
- Fascial closure
- Continuous or interrupted suture closure
- Delayed absorbable monofilament or braided suture
- Subcutaneous space closure
- No clear evidence regarding irrigation versus no irrigation
- Recommended if depth greater than 2 cm
- Routine use of subcutaneous drain placement not recommended
- Skin Closure
- Subcuticular suture versus staples
- Composite wound morbidity less with suture
- Subcuticular suture versus staples
- Peritoneal layer closure versus no closure
Possible Perioperative Complications
- Hemorrhage
- Uterine atony (most common cause of hemorrhage)
- Retained uterine products
- Uterine Vessel Laceration
- Extension of hysterotomy into cervix/vagina
- Disseminated intravascular coagulation
- Endomyometritis
- Wound infection
- Urinary retention
- Vesicovaginal fistula
- Bowel injury, ileus, or obstruction
- Deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
- Pulmonary embolus
- Amniotic fluid embolus
References
- Anorlu RI, Maholwana B, Hofmeyr GJ. Methods of delivering the placenta at caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD004737. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004737.pub2.
- Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:29-38.
- Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Siesto G, Loverro G, Bolis P. Blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision at cesarean delivery: a randomized comparison of 2 techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:292.e1-6.
- Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Rouse DJ, Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:294-306. Fetal macrosomia. Practice Bulletin No. 173. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:e195–209.
- Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, Garner R, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, et al. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial [published erratum appears in Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:1113]. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:33-8.
- Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1- infected adults and adolescents. Department of health and human services. DHHS. Available at: https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/contentfiles/lvguidelines/adultandadolescentgl.pdf. Retrieved July 2, 2015.
- Siddiqui M, Goldszmidt E, Fallah S, Kingdom J, Windrim R, Carvalho JC. Complications of exteriorized compared with in situ uterine repair at cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:570-5.
- Walsh CA, Walsh SR. Extraabdominal vs intraabdominal uterine repair at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:625.e1-8.
- Xu LL, Chau AM, Zuschmann A. Blunt vs. sharp uterine expansion at lower segment cesarean section delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:62.e1-8.
The CREOG Surgical Skills Task Force created this simulation as part of a standardized surgical skills curriculum for use in training residents in obstetrics and gynecology.